01 April 2026
5 min read
Published by:
In the first part of this series, we discussed the federal government’s transition from the Large-scale Generation Certificates (LGCs) to the Guarantee of Origin (GO) system for its renewable energy certification systems, directly affecting organisations who finance, buy or sell renewable energy projects.
This article examines how the transition impacts Power Purchase Agreements, which must clearly define certificate ownership, address legal changes, prevent double counting, and adjust pricing since the Renewable Electricity Guarantee of Origin (REGOs) scheme works differently from LGCs. Without proper updates, businesses risk disputes, financial loss or misleading sustainability claims.
The dual regime problem
A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) is a long-term contract between an electricity generator and a buyer (typically a utility, government entity, or corporate off-taker), under which the generator agrees to produce and supply a specified quantity of electricity and the buyer agrees to purchase it at a pre-agreed price or pricing mechanism over a fixed term.
PPAs are commonly used to finance renewable energy projects, providing revenue certainty for the generator and price stability for the buyer, without the buyer needing to own or operate the underlying generation assets.Many PPAs currently in force were drafted around LGC mechanics. New agreements and amendments to existing ones must now account for REGOs. The practical difficulty is that for some projects, both regimes are simultaneously relevant; a project's commissioning date may straddle the transition, legacy LGC entitlements may continue alongside REGO eligibility and buyers' internal reporting systems may still reference LGC language.
Without clear contractual language, businesses risk disputes, financial loss, or misleading sustainability claims. Disputes over who owns which certificates, how they are valued, and whether environmental claims must be properly substantiated.
Five things to get right in your PPA
State schemes and international alignment
At present, the GO scheme operates at the federal level, with the Clean Energy Regulator as the central administrator. Some states have their own renewable energy targets and support mechanisms, but there is no parallel state-based certificate regime that competes directly with REGOs. State schemes generally interact with, rather than replace, the federal framework.
Internationally, the GO scheme has been designed with alignment in mind. The European system of Guarantees of Origin (EGOs) under the Renewable Energy Directive is the most developed international analogue, and Australian policymakers have drawn on that model. For businesses exporting into European supply chains, particularly in hydrogen and green metals, the compatibility between REGOs and European certification frameworks will be a live commercial question. That alignment is not yet seamless, and further work is expected as the scheme matures.
The bigger picture
The move from LGCs to REGOs is not a bureaucratic reshuffling. It reflects a deliberate policy decision to build a certification system that can support Australia's role in global clean energy trade. For businesses in the renewable energy sector (whether as generators, corporate buyers, lenders or investors), the new framework changes the evidentiary basis of environmental claims, the risk profile of certificate revenue streams, and the commercial logic of long-term energy contracts.
PPAs executed now need to be drafted with that future in mind – flexible enough to accommodate further reform, yet precise enough to avoid the disputes that vague or outdated drafting will inevitably cause.
If you have any questions about Australia's new renewable energy certification system or how you should draft or update your Property Purchase Agreement, please contact us here.
Disclaimer
The information in this article is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this article is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.
Published by: